Fantasy Heartbeat
GuillotineRankingsTrade Calculator
Connect league

© 2026 Fantasy Heartbeat

  • Blog
  • Tools
  • Track Record
  • Pricing
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimers
  • Contact

Fantasy Heartbeat is an independent tool and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the National Football League (NFL), any NFL team, the NFL Players Association, ESPN, Sleeper, Yahoo, or FleaFlicker. NFL team and player names are used for identification purposes only. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

← Back to Player Explorer
Kimani Vidal headshot

Kimani Vidal

RB · #61

LAC · RB · Age 24

Redraft rank
RB72
▲RB72 · Depth+49 slots of value vs ADP
Tier
T3
Overall
#312
ADP
RB121
Consensus
Coin flip

Kimani Vidal's ceiling is capped at RB71 due to his near-zero target share and competition from Omarion Hampton, making him a bench stash candidate only.

Role & trajectory
Vidal's role as the No. 2 back is under threat with Keaton Mitchell in camp, and he faces an entrenched lead back in Omarion Hampton who beat writers project to take a significant portion of touches.
Projected outlook
Despite his breakout season showing potential, Vidal's value remains soft due to his 4% target share and the lack of development timeline beyond this year, making him a speculative bench stash at best.
Risk & schedule
The risk is high that Hampton will reclaim most touches if healthy, and Vidal's contract status means he can be displaced easily by any draft pick or signing without cost to the team.
Value vs ADP+49 slots of value
Our rank
RB72
vs
Market ADP
RB121
Projects better than the draft room is paying.
What’s driving the season rank
Case for
+
ADP value
RB121 ADP · +49 slots
Major
+
Age / role
age 24 RB
Minor
Case against
−
Projection rank
RB72 · proj. consensus
Notable
−
Source agreement
±32 rank σ · 2 sources
Notable
What similar players becameLow confidence

Of the 10 backs most similar to Kimani Vidal, 4 finished RB1, 1 finished RB3, 4 finished RB4+, 1 was off fantasy rosters.

Based on just 10 analogs — outcomes span Off rosters → RB1 — directional, not a forecast.

43%40%
  • RB143%(4)
  • RB38%(1)
  • RB4+40%(4)
  • Off rosters9%(1)
Year-two PPG range9.3 median
3.3p25–p75 6.1–15.718.4
10 most similar players
Chase Brown93%
2024·RB12 · 15.9 PPG
Khalil Herbert86%
2023·RB40 · 9.4 PPG
Isiah Pacheco69%
2023·RB6 · 15.5 PPG
Kyren Williams64%
2023·RB9 · 20.2 PPG
Chris Rodriguez61%
2024·RB70 · 5.2 PPG
Zamir White57%
2023·RB48 · 5.7 PPG

+4 more analogs

Also see:

Our read vs. the market

Beta
Buy-low — we see clear value above the market price
Why
Strong usage productionSolid carry shareAge 24 · ascendingTDs due to regress
  • ▲Dynasty age curve
  • ▲Expected fantasy points
  • ▲Opportunity share
Our view vs Market↑ 61 pts above market
Our view
86
Market
25
TD regression riskLong career runwayProducing above value

Our own independent read · beta — not a trade price.

Risk & Opportunity Analysis (12 flags)

Risk Flags

6
  • Depth Chart Block2

    Omarion Hampton returns healthy as the clear RB1 after an injury-shortened 2025 rookie season. As a first-round pick and the centerpiece of McDaniel's Shanahan-style rushing attack, Hampton will command the bellcow role that Vidal filled by default.

  • Hampton Incumbent Lead Back

    Omarion Hampton is listed as starter alongside Vidal on the most recent depth chart, and Hampton is the preferred fantasy option. Hampton's value vastly exceeds Vidal's, making Vidal a clear secondary option when healthy.

  • RB2 Competition

    The Chargers signed ex-Ravens speedster Keaton Mitchell to a 2yr/$9.25M deal in March 2026, creating direct competition for the RB2 role. Mitchell's 6.0+ YPC, 14.9% explosive-run rate, and familiarity with GM Hortiz from Baltimore give him a strong edge over Vidal for complementary snaps.

  • Backfield Competition

    The Chargers signed Keaton Mitchell to a 2-year, $9.25M deal ($5M guaranteed), directly displacing Vidal as the RB2. Mitchell's 5.8 YPC in 2025 and his explosiveness as a speed back make him the ideal complement to Hampton in new OC Mike McDaniel's space-and-pace system — a role profile Vidal does not fit.

  • Target Competition

    New OC Mike McDaniel imported Keaton Mitchell (Baltimore), a speed back in the De'Von Achane mold McDaniel favors; Mitchell is positioned to claim the change-of-pace/passing-down role and squeeze Vidal toward early-down handcuff duty only.

Opportunity Flags

6
  • Scheme Fit

    The Chargers hired Mike McDaniel as OC in January 2026. McDaniel's track record of maximizing RB production in Miami (De'Von Achane posted 1,400+ scrimmage yards in back-to-back seasons) could unlock Vidal's pass-game upside and efficiency in a creative offense.

  • Proven Backup Value

    Vidal rushed for 643 yards in 2025 (49.5 YPG) and became the first Chargers RB since Melvin Gordon in 2018 to record three 100+ yard games in a season. He showed efficiency and reliability when given opportunities during Hampton's absences.

  • Handcuff Value

    Vidal proved in 2025 he can handle a full starting workload (171 touches, 779 scrimmage yards) and showed pass-catching chops (10% target share in W19). He retains legitimate handcuff value to Hampton in leagues where Hampton is rostered.

  • Handcuff Upside

    Vidal has proven he can absorb bellcow volume when Hampton misses time, posting 779 scrimmage yards and 4 TDs across 14 games in 2025. W19's 93% snap share and 7.1-point performance confirms he's a functional lead back in an emergency — real upside for Hampton owners rostering him as a handcuff.

  • Contingent Upside

    Vidal is the proven Hampton handcuff — he posted 569+ rushing yards and 3 TDs over the eight games Hampton missed in 2025, with multiple 100-yard outings, so a Hampton injury immediately restores RB2 early-down value.

  • Contingency Value

    Vidal already proved he can carry a backfield (643 rush yds, 3 TD on 155 carries in relief of Hampton in 2025); any Hampton injury makes Vidal a startable RB2 again, giving him real contingent-upside value.

Format Comparison

Kimani Vidal — Format Comparison

FormatValuevs Best
PPR 1QBBest1,257—
PPR SF1,044-213