Jordan Whittington

WR · #147

LAR · WR · Age 25

FLEX

Jordan Whittington inherits a significant portion of Puka Nacua's vacated target share, making him a key player in the passing game.

Role & volume

Whittington has seen minimal usage recently, with an average snap share of just 10.5% over his last four games and no targets or carries.

Projected role

With Nacua suspended, Whittington is expected to see a substantial increase in target volume, potentially moving into the No. 2 receiver role on the depth chart.

Range (floor–ceiling)

Given his recent lack of involvement and the uncertainty around his new role, Whittington's floor remains low while his ceiling is elevated due to the vacated targets. However, he ranks as WR138 on our value board.

Intel may be outdated · updated 44 days ago

Current statusLAR

Our read vs. the market

Beta

Fairly priced — we're in line with the marketIn line

Why

Strong usage productionElite target shareAge 25 · ascendingTDs due to regress

Our view vs Market↑ 10 pts above market

Our view

Market

Thin opportunity shareLong career runwayLow draft pedigree

Our own read · beta — not a trade price.

Risk & Opportunity Analysis (4 flags)

Risk Flags

Target Competition
Slotted behind an entrenched Nacua-Adams duo with Mumpfield and Atwell also competing for scraps, leaving a razor-thin target share (4%, WOPR 0.08) with little room to grow organically.
Injury History
Missed no games in 2025 despite a knee MRI scare and a chest injury in the conference championship, and the Rams have managed around minor ailments without expanding his workload afterward.

Opportunity Flags

Scheme Fit
The Rams' pass-heavy offense (PROE +5% over expected) creates more total passing volume than most environments, giving even a low-share complementary piece some incidental upside.
Special Teams Value
Whittington's continued work as a kickoff returner adds a modest, non-target-share path to roster stickiness even while his offensive role stays marginal.

Format Comparison

Jordan Whittington — Format Comparison

Format	Value	vs Best
PPR 1QBBest	641	—
PPR SF	508	-133

Format

Value

vs Best

PPR 1QBBest

641

—

PPR SF

508

-133